So how insulting is Sarah Palin?

Submitted by mamamayhem on Sun, 08/31/2008 - 8:27am.

McCain's assumption that women who voted for a prochoice, experienced Senator will follow blindly and vote for an antichoice inexperienced beauty queen just because she has boobies is insulting to American women all over this country. He went out and found himself a pretty little puppet to try and steal the groundbreaking thunder of the Democratic nominee.
After going on and on about how Obama is so inexperienced and won't be able to lead the country, he brings in a woman who's been governor of ALASKA (I don't think you can get much farther from Washington) for HALF a term. It's demeaning, it's insulting, he assumes we're all stupid, and the worst thing is, I think it'll work.

( categories: )

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by adcaela on Sun, 08/31/2008 - 8:44am.

I think he is being demeaning and she was chosen for her womanhood, but I also feel like you are also being demeaning. I obviously don't subscribe to Palin's politics, but I don't think we need to contribute to the pretty women must be dumb mentality. She is a skilled politician with bad politics, but those politics are in line with her party. (which happens to suck)

Submitted by mamamayhem on Sun, 08/31/2008 - 8:53am.

She's powerfully inexperienced. Yes, I believe she'll be a puppet simply because she'll mimic what he says and why? Because she's got no experience to form any other ideas. I'm not implying she's stupid because she's pretty, I'm implying she was picked based off of that inexperience so she would BE stupid and easily controlled. Her looks are an afterthought (though, based on republican lines of thinking, women are SUPPOSED to be pretty and quiet, so her looks were probably factored in there too). I've done a lot of research on her lately, and i haven't seen anything to show me she's a "skilled politician." She's a former PTA member, former mayor of a city of nine thousand, and she became governor of one of the least populated states in the country. She has no experience in foreign policy, so it'll be easy to tell her what to do, since she'll have to lean on everyone else. "Trust me, Sarah, we know more about this than you do."

Submitted by Hilary on Sun, 08/31/2008 - 6:26pm.

]

adcaela wrote:
I think he is being demeaning and she was chosen for her womanhood, but I also feel like you are also being demeaning. I obviously don't subscribe to Palin's politics, but I don't think we need to contribute to the pretty women must be dumb mentality. She is a skilled politician with bad politics, but those politics are in line with her party. (which happens to suck)

I get what you're saying Charlie. At the same time, I feel like the fact that, as you say, she was chosen for her womanhood justifies mamamayhem's "pretty little puppet" characterization. It's not that she must be dumb because she's pretty, but rather she was chosen only for her value as a figurehead and not for her degree of intellect/experience/appropriateness. She was a small time mayor, a half-term governor, and they've met twice. I think that a) they wanted a token woman to woo bitter HRC supporters, b) they wanted someone with no record to bash c) they wanted someone who would appeal to crazy right-wingers (feminists for life, anyone?), and d) they wanted a recognizable icon (i.e. a pretty face). I don't think they were looking for a vice president as much as they were looking for a blank slate (with a female body) that they can paint with whatever images are the most marketable. I heard a conservative blogger on NPR today call her the "energy answer." Seriously, wtf?
It is insulting. I think you just about hit the nail on the head when you mentioned
mamamayhem wrote:
McCain's assumption that women who voted for a prochoice, experienced Senator will follow blindly and vote for an antichoice inexperienced beauty queen
.
The only thing I don't agree with you on, mamamayhem, is that it will work. I don't think they stand a fucking chance.
(p.s. despite the choice of SP being awful on a number of different levels, this does mean that in the upcoming year there will definitely either be a POC as president or a woman as VP, which kind of blows my mind.)

Submitted by SkyKid45 on Mon, 09/01/2008 - 3:43pm.

I totally agree w/ you mamamayhem but I really don't know if it will work; If anything I think hillary clinton will campaign harder for obama now. Seriously, if the only reason you were voting for clinton is that she has a vag, then yeah palin is the one for you. But ovbiously she is against everything that clinton stands for and I don't think that it will work.
BTW, I know this is a bit off topic, but did anyone else see that Palin's 17 year old daughter is pregnant? The Palin's are proud of her DECISION to have the baby.

Submitted by mamamayhem on Mon, 09/01/2008 - 5:24pm.

Every newscaster I've heard talk about the pregnancy has said "the family's decision" is to keep the baby. The "family's" decision. It's also the "family's" decision that she'll get married. At 17. That'd be fine if we were currently residing in 1961. Maybe if Palin hadn't had her head on backward, she'd have realized that teenagers have sex, and her daughter could've been on birth control and not been pregnant and forced into marriage in the first place.
The reason why I think it'll work, is because there are so many women running around so excited about this, they don't seem to realize what's been nominated is an empty shell with boobs and a vag. Hillary was a hard hitting politico, I'm really hoping that the bulk of women out there aren't going to fall for this. And I hope Hillary comes out with force to campaign for Obama, and undo a lot of the damage that was done during the Democratic race.

Submitted by boigrrrlwonder on Tue, 09/02/2008 - 8:54am.

I read about her daughter, too. I feel so bad for her - considering her mother's politics and the timing, I bet she's under enormous pressure to marry. I can only hope that's what the girl wants. However, I'm glad that Obama and McCain have decided to mostly leave the girl alone.

Submitted by Hilary on Wed, 09/03/2008 - 12:12pm.

mamamayhem wrote:
The reason why I think it'll work, is because there are so many women running around so excited about this, they don't seem to realize what's been nominated is an empty shell with boobs and a vag.

I've seen a couple of articles (I'm sorry I can't cite them for you - one from CNN.com, maybe?) that indicate that it's had the opposite effect: they say that McCain's popularity has dipped slightly among Clinton supporters because they read his choice of Palin as being motivated only by a desire to get more votes rather than by her qualifications.
As far as her being an "empty shell with boobs and a vag" goes, I really don't agree with that, and I think maybe I misunderstood your first comment. She's not an empty shell, she's a woman who's at least smart, ambitious and savvy enough to gain the office of Governor in Alaska. She's just not presidential material either, and she clearly not picked for her qualifications. She was picked to be, as you put it, "a pretty little puppet" regardless of how smart or dumb she actually is.
I'm not remotely qualified for a position like that either, and I'd like to think I'm a fairly intelligent person. The difference is that nobody's holding me up, expecting voters to follow me just because they would follow a qualified woman with opposite politics but similar anatomy.
Does that make any sense?

Submitted by Hilary on Wed, 09/03/2008 - 12:12pm.

mamamayhem wrote:
The reason why I think it'll work, is because there are so many women running around so excited about this, they don't seem to realize what's been nominated is an empty shell with boobs and a vag.

I've seen a couple of articles (I'm sorry I can't cite them for you - one from CNN.com, maybe?) that indicate that it's had the opposite effect: they say that McCain's popularity has dipped slightly among Clinton supporters because they read his choice of Palin as being motivated only by a desire to get more votes rather than by her qualifications.
As far as her being an "empty shell with boobs and a vag" goes, I really don't agree with that, and I think maybe I misunderstood your first comment. She's not an empty shell, she's a woman who's at least smart, ambitious and savvy enough to gain the office of Governor in Alaska. She's just not presidential material either, and she clearly not picked for her qualifications. She was picked to be, as you put it, "a pretty little puppet" regardless of how smart or dumb she actually is.
I'm not remotely qualified for a position like that either, and I'd like to think I'm a fairly intelligent person. The difference is that nobody's holding me up, expecting voters to follow me just because they would follow a qualified woman with opposite politics but similar anatomy.
Does that make any sense?

Submitted by Elyse on Thu, 09/04/2008 - 6:28am.

I, too, find this rather insulting. But I really don't believe that it will work.
Where I live, the majority of the population is conservative. Don't ask me why... seeing as I live in Northern IL, the SW suburbs of Chicago, and a relatively large town. It doesn't make sense to me, but most of my friends' parents were determined to vote for McCain. However, many of them that I have recently talked to decided to change their minds because of Mcain's "ill-informed decision". And they are not just dropping the vote altogether, they are voting for Obama! When I hear all of these people saying this, it almost makes me happy he chose Palin.
What scares me is if they were to win the election. We all know that McCain isn't the epitome of health and youthfulness. While I think I could stand, however horrible it may be, McCain becoming president... I do not think I could watch Palin take over if something were to happen to him. That alone scares the crap out of me.
Watching her speech last night... it sunk my thoughts on her even lower.

Submitted by mamamayhem on Fri, 09/05/2008 - 5:26pm.

I will admit, my wording has been a little harsh. I don't know, this nomination more than just insults me, it makes me very very angry.
I watched the republican convention at my SO's insistence (I like to avoid television/news/radio etc that makes me angry, I feel it isn't productive or helpful for other areas of my life that the funky mood inevitably leaks into) Her speech where she doesn't actually state where she stands on anything, but feels free to belittle the fact that Obama was a community organizer and helped improve the country on a smaller scale through volunteer work, and how she belittled the environmental positions as well....it really angers me. I tried to give her a shot, I tried to maybe see if there was an up side to this woman, but no. I didn't see one. She was condescending and spoke out of turn about things she had no business talking about. "The presidency isn't a journey of self discovery" or something to that effect, like she has this long standing unblemished record of Washington experience.
I did find it interesting that people will talk about how wonderful she is for raising a child with Down's while running for office. I'm sorry, but I don't feel that a woman who can afford full time care for such a young child so she can be vice president could possibly understand the childcare crisis befalling this country. The mere fact that she can afford these five children and work a high profile job says something to me about how out of touch she's bound to be with the average struggling to make ends meet mothers like me.
Did anyone watch the Daily Show last night? They did this piece interviewing people who attended the conference discussing the fact that people were saying it was Bristol's "decision" to have the baby. As if she had a....what's that word? Where there's two options and you pick the one that's best for you?

Submitted by Hilary on Sun, 09/07/2008 - 4:17pm.

I didn't hear Palin's speech (I listen to the conventions on the radio), but most of the people I've talked to have been saying the same sorts of things as you: that it was just kind of petty and mean.
Speaking of the Daily Show, the clip below is pretty hilarious:
http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=184086&title=sarah...

Submitted by MamaButterfly on Wed, 09/10/2008 - 8:48pm.

I just... I hate her. And even though I will vote for Obama, I think the election's already been stolen.

Submitted by xoAxWESOxo on Wed, 09/10/2008 - 9:33pm.

This was a big topic on the radio while I was driving home today (mostly because of Obama's pig comment) and they said that it was shown that there's been a big shift in white women from supporting Obama to McCain, I was so disappointed to hear that. I'm so proud to be a woman and I would absolutely love to have a woman as president or VP someday, but I'd much rather have a man who shares my political beliefs as president than a woman who doesn't even support my right to choose abortion.

Submitted by mamamayhem on Thu, 09/11/2008 - 4:31pm.

She says we might have to go to war with Russia. She throws the word around like it doesn't mean anything. I suppose to her, it doesn't. Those are someone else's babies she's sending to die. War with Russia. Russia's not even a member of NATO. No one knows exactly how many nukes they have, they have a lot. Russia...if they're at war with us, they won't hesitate. This whole country will be a smoking crater, Canada and Mexico desolate radiated wastelands.
Now I have another reason to vote for Obama. War is real. War has ravaged my generation. The boys aren't coming home the same. They're coming home torn and broken. My brother is in Iraq. I want him home safe, and I don't want him sent back. And I don't want him in fucking Russia.

Submitted by Yabinti on Fri, 09/19/2008 - 7:31am.

I received this in an email....
***Rape/Incest Trigger***
Hello everyone!
For most of you, this is probably preaching to the choir. However, I think this mail does get the point across, in a good way. For those of you who havent seen the Vagina Monologues (maybe its sounds offensive or too blunt) trust me, you should see it. Its hilarious, and sad, it will make you laugh and cry and very proud to be a woman, no matter what your political or religious offiliation. Here is Eve Ensler's latest:
Eve Ensler, the American playwright, performer, feminist and
>>activist best known for "The Vagina Monologues", wrote the
>>following about Sarah Palin.
>>
Drill, Drill, Drill
>>
>>I am having Sarah Palin nightmares. I dreamt last night that she
>>was a member of a club where they rode snowmobiles and wore the
>>claws of drowned and starved polar bears around their necks. I have
>>a particular thing for Polar Bears. Maybe it's their snowy
>>whiteness or their bigness or the fact that they live in the arctic
>>or that I have never seen one in person or touched one. Maybe it
>>is the fact that they live so comfortably on ice. Whatever it is, I
>>need the polar bears.
>>
>>I don't like raging at women. I am a Feminist and have spent my
>>life trying to build community, help empower women and stop
>>violence against them. It is hard to write about Sarah Palin. This
>>is why the Sarah Palin choice was all the more insidious and
>>cynical. The people who made this choice count on the goodness and
>>solidarity of Feminists.
>>
>>But everything Sarah Palin believes in and practices is
>>antithetical to Feminism which for me is part of one story --
>>connected to saving the earth, ending racism, empowering women,
>>giving young girls options, opening our minds, deepening tolerance,
>>and ending violence and war.
>>
>>I believe that the McCain/Palin ticket is one of the most dangerous
>>choices of my lifetime, and should this country chose those
>>candidates the fall-out may be so great, the destruction so vast in
>>so many areas that America may never recover. But what is equally
>>disturbing is the impact that duo would have on the rest of the
>>world. Unfortunately, this is not a joke. In my lifetime I have
>>seen the clownish, the inept, the bizarre be elected to the
>>presidency with regularity.
>>
>>Sarah Palin does not believe in evolution. I take this as a
>>metaphor. In her world and the world of Fundamentalists nothing
>>changes or gets better or evolves. She does not believe in global
>>warming. The melting of the arctic, the storms that are destroying
>>our cities, the pollution and rise of cancers, are all part of
>>God's plan. She is fighting to take the polar bears off the
>>endangered species list. The earth, in Palin's view, is here to be
>>taken and plundered. The wolves and the bears are here to be shot
>>and plundered. The oil is here to be taken and plundered. Iraq is
>>here to be taken and plundered. As she said herself of the Iraqi
>>war, "It was a task from God."
>>
>>
>>Sarah Palin does not believe in abortion. She does not believe
>>women who are raped and incested and ripped open against their
>>will should have a right to determine whether they have their
>>rapist's baby or not.
>>
>>
>>She obviously does not believe in sex education or birth control. I
>>imagine her daughter was practicing abstinence and we know how many
>>babies that makes.
>>
>>
>>Sarah Palin does not much believe in thinking. From what I gather
>>she has tried to ban books from the library, has a tendency to
>>dispense with people who think independently. She cannot tolerate
>>an environment of ambiguity and difference. This is a woman who
>>could and might very well be the next president of the United
>>States. She would govern one of the most diverse populations on the
>>earth.
>>
>>
>>Sarah believes in guns. She has her own custom Austrian hunting
>>rifle. She has been known to kill 40 caribou at a clip. She has
>>shot hundreds of wolves from the air.
>>
>>Sarah believes in God. That is of course her right, her private
>>right. But when God and Guns come together in the public sector,
>>when war is declared in God's name, when the rights of women are
>>denied in his name, that is the end of separation of church and
>>state and the undoing of everything America has ever tried to be.
>>
>>I write to my sisters. I write because I believe we hold this
>>election in our hands. This vote is a vote that will determine the
>>future not just of the U.S., but of the planet. It will determine
>>whether we create policies to save the earth or make it forever
>>uninhabitable for humans. It will determine whether we move towards
>>dialogue and diplomacy in the world or whether we escalate violence
>>through invasion, undermining and attack. It will determine whether
>>we go for oil, strip mining, coal burning or invest our money in
>>alternatives that will free us from dependency and destruction. It
>>will determine if money gets spent on education and healthcare or
>>whether we build more and more methods of killing. It will
>>determine whether America is a free open tolerant society or a
>>closed place of fear, fundamentalism and aggression.
>>
>>
>>If the Polar Bears don't move you to go and do everything in your
>>power to get Obama elected then consider the chant that filled the
>>hall after Palin spoke at the RNC, "Drill Drill Drill." I think of
>>teeth when I think of drills. I think of rape. I think of
>>destruction. I think of domination. I think of military exercises
>>that force mindless repetition, emptying the brain of analysis,
>>doubt, ambiguity or dissent. I think of pain.
>>
>>
>>Do we want a future of drilling? More holes in the ozone, in the
>>floor of the sea, more holes in our thinking, in the trust between
>>nations and peoples, more holes in the fabric of this precious
>>thing we call life?
>>
>>
>>
>>Eve Ensler
>>September 5, 2008
--
"Well-behaved women seldom make history." --Laurel Thatcher Ulrich

Submitted by becka on Fri, 09/19/2008 - 10:33am.

I've tried not to think about SP too much,so far. Anytime I do my brain goes numb, probably with fear. And I'm not even American.
Edit: & I think it's laughable that anyone could possibly think that bristol palin made any sort of "descision" to keep her baby.

Submitted by mamamayhem on Fri, 09/19/2008 - 10:39am.

It's not so much that she MADE the decision, it's that the Palin camp actually used the word decision.

Submitted by girlgoddess83 on Sun, 09/21/2008 - 7:10pm.

I found this article on SP and thought I'd share:
Fault Lines In Feminism: Palin Politics Expose Fractures
By Anne K.
Ream for the Chicago Tribune
September 21, 2008
Policies Not In Interests of Women
By most indications, the governor has struck an admirable work-home balance, realizing her ambitions while raising her children with the active support of family, friends, co-workers and her "First Dude." Apparently Hillary Clinton got it right: It does take a village to raise a child.
Those who have criticized Palin for her personal or familial choices have been wrong to do so. She should be applauded for striking a work-family balance.
She just shouldn't be elected for it, particularly when her public policies are so at odds with the interests of women and girls.
Palin supports abstinence-only sex education programs that have increased the risk of sexually transmitted diseases and unwanted pregnancies for young girls.
She opposes gun control, despite the fact that women physically abused by current or former intimate partners have a fivefold increased risk of being murdered by that partner when he owns a gun, according to the Family Violence Prevention Fund.
Problematic positions on rape
She is a staunch opponent of reproductive freedom, taking a position that is extreme even within her own party: that women who are victims of incest or rape should be forced to bear the children of their attackers.
While she was mayor of Wasilla, her town was the only one in Alaska that required rape victims to pay for their own forensic tests. Charging victims for the "rape kits" necessary to collect evidence and convict sexual predators was a "cost-cutting" measure that continued until complaints about her administration's policy prompted the Alaska State Legislature to pass a bill that banned this anti-victim practice statewide.
And if "results" are what matter, we should consider this: Alaska has our nation's highest rate of reported forcible rapes per capita—21/2 times the national average, according to the FBI. Current and former officials from Palin's administration confirm that an ambitious plan to tackle the sexual violence crisis has apparently stalled after arriving at the governor's office.
Such inconvenient facts fly in the face of Palin's pro-women positioning and remind us that real feminism is not only—or primarily—about gender or personal ambition. It is a belief system that is realized when we are as passionately engaged in the struggle for the rights of all women as we are in the struggle for our own.
The irony is that there is a strong feminist candidate running for vice president. Sen. Joe Biden has a long, impressive history of addressing issues affecting women and girls. But Biden—the principal architect and sponsor of the landmark 1994 Violence Against Women Act, a law that has been heralded as one of the most significant breakthroughs in civil rights for women in two decades—is, inconveniently, a white male.

Submitted by Hilary on Sun, 09/21/2008 - 7:48pm.

girlgoddess83 wrote:
Those who have criticized Palin for her personal or familial choices have been wrong to do so. She should be applauded for striking a work-family balance.
She just shouldn't be elected for it, particularly when her public policies are so at odds with the interests of women and girls.

Yes, this.
Palin would make a terrible vice-president. I can't even imagine it. I really can't believe that the election is as close as it is (although it does seem like Obama is pulling ahead more in recent polls).
And here's another article about Palin (this one by Gloria Steinem). I found this on a friend's facebook page, so I'm not sure where it's originally from.
Quote:
By Gloria Steinem
September 4, 2008
Here's the good news: Women have become so politically powerful that even the anti-feminist right wing -- the folks with a headlock on the Republican Party -- are trying to appease the gender gap with a first-ever female vice president. We owe this to women -- and to many men too -- who have picketed, gone on hunger strikes or confronted violence at the polls so women can vote. We owe it to Shirley Chisholm, who first took the "white-male-only" sign off the White House, and to Hillary Rodham Clinton, who hung in there through ridicule and misogyny to win 18 million votes.
But here is even better news: It won't work. This isn't the first time a boss has picked an unqualified woman just because she agrees with him and opposes everything most other women want and need. Feminism has never been about getting a job for one woman. It's about making life more fair for women everywhere. It's not about a piece of the existing pie; there are too many of us for that. It's about baking a new pie.
Selecting Sarah Palin, who was touted all summer by Rush Limbaugh, is no way to attract most women, including die-hard Clinton supporters. Palin shares nothing but a chromosome with Clinton . Her down-home, divisive and deceptive speech did nothing to cosmeticize a Republican convention that has more than twice as many male delegates as female, a presidential candidate who is owned and operated by the right wing and a platform that opposes pretty much everything Clinton's candidacy stood for -- and that Barack Obama's still does. To vote in protest for McCain/Palin would be like saying, "Somebody stole my shoes, so I'll amputate my legs."
This is not to beat up on Palin. I defend her right to be wrong, even on issues that matter most to me. I regret that people say she can't do the job because she has children in need of care, especially if they wouldn't say the same about a father. I get no pleasure from imagining her in the spotlight on national and foreign policy issues about which she has zero background, with one month to learn to compete with Sen. Joe Biden's 37 years' experience.
Palin has been honest about what she doesn't know. When asked last month about the vice presidency, she said, "I still can't answer that question until someone answers for me: What is it exactly that the VP does every day?" When asked about Iraq , she said, "I haven't really focused much on the war in Iraq ."
She was elected governor largely because the incumbent was unpopular, and she's won over Alaskans mostly by using unprecedented oil wealth to give a $1,200 rebate to every resident. Now she is being praised by McCain's campaign as a tax cutter, despite the fact that Alaska has no state income or sales tax. Perhaps McCain has opposed affirmative action for so long that he doesn't know it's about inviting more people to meet standards, not lowering them. Or perhaps McCain is following the Bush administration habit, as in the Justice Department, of putting a job candidate's views on "God, guns and gays" ahead of competence. The difference is that McCain is filling a job one 72-year-old heartbeat away from the presidency.
So let's be clear: The culprit is John McCain. He may have chosen Palin out of change-envy, or a belief that women can't tell the difference between form and content, but the main motive was to please right-wing ideologues; the same ones who nixed anyone who is now or ever has been a supporter of reproductive freedom. If that were not the case, McCain could have chosen a woman who knows what a vice president does and who has thought about Iraq ; someone like Texas Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison or Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine. McCain could have taken a baby step away from right-wing patriarchs who determine his actions, right down to opposing the Violence Against Women Act.
Palin's value to those patriarchs is clear: She opposes just about every issue that women support by a majority or plurality. She believes that creationism should be taught in public schools but disbelieves global warming; she opposes gun control but supports government control of women's wombs; she opposes stem cell research but approves "abstinence-only" programs, which increase unwanted births, sexually transmitted diseases and abortions; she tried to use taxpayers' millions for a state program to shoot wolves from the air but didn't spend enough money to fix a state school system with the lowest high-school graduation rate in the nation; she runs with a candidate who opposes the Fair Pay Act but supports $500 million in subsidies for a natural gas pipeline across Alaska; she supports drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve, though even McCain has opted for the lesser evil of offshore drilling. She is Phyllis Schlafly, only younger.
I don't doubt her sincerity. As a lifetime member of the National Rifle Assn., she doesn't just support killing animals from helicopters, she does it herself. She doesn't just talk about increasing the use of fossil fuels but puts a coal-burning power plant in her own small town. She doesn't just echo McCain's pledge to criminalize abortion by overturning Roe vs. Wade, she says that if one of her daughters were impregnated by rape or incest, she should bear the child. She not only opposes reproductive freedom as a human right but implies that it dictates abortion, without saying that it also protects the right to have a child.
So far, the major new McCain supporter that Palin has attracted is James Dobson of Focus on the Family. Of course, for Dobson, "women are merely waiting for their husbands to assume leadership," so he may be voting for Palin's husband.
Being a hope-a-holic, however, I can see two long-term bipartisan gains from this contest.
Republicans may learn they can't appeal to right-wing patriarchs and most women at the same time. A loss in November could cause the centrist majority of Republicans to take back their party, which was the first to support the Equal Rights Amendment and should be the last to want to invite government into the wombs of women.
And American women, who suffer more because of having two full-time jobs than from any other single injustice, finally have support on a national stage from male leaders who know that women can't be equal outside the home until men are equal in it. Barack Obama and Joe Biden are campaigning on their belief that men should be, can be and want to be at home for their children.
This could be huge.
Gloria Steinem is an author, feminist organizer and co-founder of the Women's Media Center . She supported Hillary Clinton and is now supporting Barack Obama.

Submitted by MamaButterfly on Fri, 09/26/2008 - 8:50am.

The polls lie. The media is owned, everything's rigged. By popular opinion, Obama's probably winning by a landslide, but we'll never know, because the media is propaganda and lies.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.